HEALTHY RELATIONSHIP FOLLOW RECIPROCITY PRINCIPLES AND HARM PRINCIPLES
RELATIONSHIP IS LIKE TRAFFIC, THERE HAS TO BE GIVE AND TAKE, BUT TO CERTAIN DEGREES.
IF A PERSON YIELD TOO MUCH, HE STOPS.
WHEN A PERSON DRIVE ALONE IN A PARKING LOT, HE CAN DO WHATEVER HE WANTS.
SOME PEOPLE PRETEND IN HYPOCRISY AND SUFFER DUE TO AFRAID GETTING CAUGHT
THEIR LANGUAGE IS INDIRECT TO AVOID ACCOUNTABILITY
IF ANOTHER PERSON SAY SOMETHING THAT IS TRUE, NO REASON TO GET UPSET
IF ANOTHER PERSON SAY SOMETHING THAT IS FALSE, NO REASON TO GET UPSET
WE GET UPSET BECAUSE WE ARE AFRAID GETTING CAUGHT
BECAUSE WE LIE AND HAVE A SECRET
PEOPLE WHO ALWAYS YIELD IS STUPID BECAUSE THEY DON'T KNOW
THEY SACRIFICE THEIR HAPPINESS FOR PROMISE OF PEACE
THEY RESPOND TO THREAT GESTURE AND FRIENDLY GESTURE
IN RELATIONSHIP, THERE ARE TWO INDIVIDUALS.
WHEN A PERSON YIELD HIS SELF, THERE IS ONLY ONE INDIVIDUAL AND AN ASSISTANT.
SOME PEOPLE DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO LIVE WITH OTHERS AND ONLY WANTS TO CHANGE OTHERS TO ADJUST TO HIM
RESPONDING TO DISTRESS SIGNAL AND ATTRACTING SIGNAL
RESPONDING TO GOOD AND BAD BEHAVIORS.
Monday, April 30, 2012
MIND PREDICTING THE FUTURE
MIND'S FUNCTION IS TO COMMENT, THAT IS TO USE LANGUAGE TO EXPLAIN SENSE EXPERIENCE
WE COMMENT USING VERBAL OR VISUAL MENTALESE
WHEN WE GO TO A PLACE, WE MAKE A COMMENT ABOUT THE PLACE, LIKE GPS TELLING US THE NAME OF A PLACE. THIS IS WHAT WE REMEMBER AS MEMORY
WE ALSO PREDICT THE FUTURE ALL THE TIME USING OUR BOTTOM UP PROCESSING
WE SCARE OUR SELVES OR GET GREEDY.
WE COMMENT USING VERBAL OR VISUAL MENTALESE
WHEN WE GO TO A PLACE, WE MAKE A COMMENT ABOUT THE PLACE, LIKE GPS TELLING US THE NAME OF A PLACE. THIS IS WHAT WE REMEMBER AS MEMORY
WE ALSO PREDICT THE FUTURE ALL THE TIME USING OUR BOTTOM UP PROCESSING
WE SCARE OUR SELVES OR GET GREEDY.
HYPOCRISY OF COMPLEX
The term "complex", or "feeling-toned complex of ideas", as a 'node' in the unconscious; a knot of unconscious feelings and beliefs, detectable indirectly, through behavior that is puzzling or hard to account for. Complexes can be positive or negative, resulting in good or bad consequences . complexes are building blocks of the psyche and the source of all human emotions. Complexes are thought to operate "autonomously and interfere with the intentions of the will, disturbing the memory and conscious performance". "Jung stressed that complexes are not negative in themselves, but their effects often are".
the ego in a broadly comprehensive theory of complexes, often referring to it as the ego-complex as illustrated when he said "by ego I understand a complex of ideas which constitutes the center of my field of consciousness and appears to possess a high degree of continuity and identity. Hence I also speak of an ego-complex".
Jung often used the term "complex" to describe a usually unconscious, repressed, yet highly influential symbolic material that is incompatible with the consciousness. complexes as "'stuck-together' agglomerations of thoughts, feelings, behavior patterns, and somatic forms of expression". Some complexes usurp power from the ego and can cause constant psychological disturbances and symptoms of neurosis. With intervention, it may become conscious and greatly reduced in their impact. Jung described the power complexes can hold when he said "what is not so well known, but far more important theoretically, is that complexes can have us. The existence of complexes throws serious doubt on the naive assumption of the unity of consciousness, which is equated with 'psyche,' and on the supremacy of the will. Every constellation of a complex postulates a disturbed state of consciousness. The unity of consciousness is disrupted and the intentions of the will are impeded or made impossible. Even memory is often noticeably affected, as we have seen. The complex must therefore be a psychic factor which, in terms of energy, possesses a value that sometimes exceeds that of our conscious intentions, otherwise such disruptions of the conscious order would not be possible at all. And in fact, an active complex puts us momentarily under a state of duress, of compulsive thinking and acting, for which under certain conditions the only appropriate term would be the judicial concept of diminished responsibility" (Jung, [1960] 1969:par. 200).
Every individual needs revolution, inner division, overthrow of the existing order, and renewal, but not by forcing them upon his neighbors under the hypocritical cloak of Christian love or the sense of social responsibility or any of the other beautiful euphemisms for unconscious urges to personal power (Jung, 1966:5).
The Golden Rule or ethic of reciprocity is a maxim,[2] ethical code, or morality[3] that essentially states either of the following:
GROWING UP, WE DEVELOP COMPLEX/NODE WHEN EXPERIENCING FRUSTRATION OR TRAUMA OR CHASING AFTER SOOTHING OBJECTS.
MOSTLY, WE ARE AWARE OF POSITIVE COMPLEX AND NOT AWARE OF NEGATIVE COMPLEX.
POSITIVE COMPLEX CREATE OUR PERSONALITY AND OUR NEGATIVE COMPLEX CREATE OUR SHADOW.
OUR SHADOW IS OUR HYPOCRITICAL NEGATIVE COMPLEX
WE ARE USUALLY BLINDED BY OUR PERSONALITY TO SEE OUR HYPOCRITICAL NEGATIVE COMPLEX THUS SHADOW.
IT IS NORMAL PHENOMENA FOR TEENAGE YEARS WHERE WE GET EMOTIONALLY GET HIJACKED BY OUR IDEALISM OR SOOTHING BEHAVIORS WHEN EXPERIENCING TURBULANT TRAUMATIC TEEN LIFE.
PATHOLOGICAL HYPOCRISY IS A PERSON WHO EXPERIENCE ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT AND EXPERIENCE REPEATED TRAUMA AND GOT STUCK IN RIGID PERSONALITY, NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE COMPLEX. HE GET BLINDED BY HIS RIGID PERSONALITY TO SOOTH HIS STRONG NEGATIVE TRAUMATIC FEELINGS.
the ego in a broadly comprehensive theory of complexes, often referring to it as the ego-complex as illustrated when he said "by ego I understand a complex of ideas which constitutes the center of my field of consciousness and appears to possess a high degree of continuity and identity. Hence I also speak of an ego-complex".
Jung often used the term "complex" to describe a usually unconscious, repressed, yet highly influential symbolic material that is incompatible with the consciousness. complexes as "'stuck-together' agglomerations of thoughts, feelings, behavior patterns, and somatic forms of expression". Some complexes usurp power from the ego and can cause constant psychological disturbances and symptoms of neurosis. With intervention, it may become conscious and greatly reduced in their impact. Jung described the power complexes can hold when he said "what is not so well known, but far more important theoretically, is that complexes can have us. The existence of complexes throws serious doubt on the naive assumption of the unity of consciousness, which is equated with 'psyche,' and on the supremacy of the will. Every constellation of a complex postulates a disturbed state of consciousness. The unity of consciousness is disrupted and the intentions of the will are impeded or made impossible. Even memory is often noticeably affected, as we have seen. The complex must therefore be a psychic factor which, in terms of energy, possesses a value that sometimes exceeds that of our conscious intentions, otherwise such disruptions of the conscious order would not be possible at all. And in fact, an active complex puts us momentarily under a state of duress, of compulsive thinking and acting, for which under certain conditions the only appropriate term would be the judicial concept of diminished responsibility" (Jung, [1960] 1969:par. 200).
Every individual needs revolution, inner division, overthrow of the existing order, and renewal, but not by forcing them upon his neighbors under the hypocritical cloak of Christian love or the sense of social responsibility or any of the other beautiful euphemisms for unconscious urges to personal power (Jung, 1966:5).
It is under all circumstances an advantage to be in full possession of one's personality, otherwise the repressed elements will only crop up as a hindrance elsewhere, not just at some unimportant point, but at the very spot where we are most sensitive. If people can be educated to see the shadow-side of their nature clearly, it may be hoped that they will also learn to understand and love their fellow men better. A little less hypocrisy and a little more self-knowledge can only have good results in respect for our neighbor; for we are all too prone to transfer to our fellows the injustice and violence we inflict upon our own natures (Jung, 1966:par. 28).In New Paths in Psychology (1916) Jung pointedly referred to the "hypocritical pretenses of man".
Dream-analysis above all else mercilessly uncovers the lying morality and hypocritical pretences of man, showing him, for
The Golden Rule or ethic of reciprocity is a maxim,[2] ethical code, or morality[3] that essentially states either of the following:
- (Positive form): One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself.[2]
- (Negative/prohibitive form, also called the Silver Rule): One should not treat others in ways that one would not like to be treated.
once, the other side of his character in the most vivid light (Jung, 1966:par. 437).HARM PRINCIPLE - ACTION THAT DOESN'T VIOLATE OTHERS
GROWING UP, WE DEVELOP COMPLEX/NODE WHEN EXPERIENCING FRUSTRATION OR TRAUMA OR CHASING AFTER SOOTHING OBJECTS.
MOSTLY, WE ARE AWARE OF POSITIVE COMPLEX AND NOT AWARE OF NEGATIVE COMPLEX.
POSITIVE COMPLEX CREATE OUR PERSONALITY AND OUR NEGATIVE COMPLEX CREATE OUR SHADOW.
OUR SHADOW IS OUR HYPOCRITICAL NEGATIVE COMPLEX
WE ARE USUALLY BLINDED BY OUR PERSONALITY TO SEE OUR HYPOCRITICAL NEGATIVE COMPLEX THUS SHADOW.
IT IS NORMAL PHENOMENA FOR TEENAGE YEARS WHERE WE GET EMOTIONALLY GET HIJACKED BY OUR IDEALISM OR SOOTHING BEHAVIORS WHEN EXPERIENCING TURBULANT TRAUMATIC TEEN LIFE.
PATHOLOGICAL HYPOCRISY IS A PERSON WHO EXPERIENCE ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT AND EXPERIENCE REPEATED TRAUMA AND GOT STUCK IN RIGID PERSONALITY, NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE COMPLEX. HE GET BLINDED BY HIS RIGID PERSONALITY TO SOOTH HIS STRONG NEGATIVE TRAUMATIC FEELINGS.
Saturday, April 28, 2012
HYPOCRISY
WE ARE NATURAL PRODUCT WHO IS ABLE TO LEARN
IN LEARNING, WE ARE NURTURED BY ENVIRONMENT
NATURALLY, WE HAVE GENETIC TEMPERAMENT, ACTIVE/PASSIVE, SOCIALLY EASY/DIFFICULT, SENSITIVE/NOT SENSITIVE
THIS IS OUR BASIC FOUNDATION AND BELOW AWARENESS
SELF IS BELOW AWARENESS FROM THE BEGINNING
ONLY LATER WE DEVELOP COGNITION/MIND AS ADDITION TO OUR SENSES
SOME OF OUR TEMPERAMENT IS ACCEPTABLE BY OUR ENVIRONMENT, SOME IS NOT.
IN ORDER TO FIT IN, WE HAVE TO SUBMERGE OUR TEMPERAMENT
AND LEARN TO ACT THAT INVITE REWARDS AND APPROVAL
WE LEARN TO PRETEND SOCIALLY ACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOR AND HIDE SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOR AND TEMPERAMENT.
IN LEARNING, WE COGNIZE INFORMATION AND AFTER REPEATED ACTION, IT BECOMES AUTOMATIC AND IS SENT TO BELOW AWARENESS
THIS IS ANOTHER PART OF OUR SELVES, SELF THAT WE LEARN
WE LEARN BY WATCHING OTHERS' BEHAVIOR
WE LEARN TO BE VICTIMIZER/VICTIM.
WE PUNISH THOSE WHO VICTIMIZE BUT WE LET OURSELVES VICTIMIZE OTHERS
WE DEVELOP ALTER EGO TO PUNISH THOSE VICTIMIZER BUT OURSELVES
AN ADDICT BECOME COUNSELOR, A SEX OFFENDER BECOME AN ADVOCATE FOR VICTIM.
WE HIDE BEHIND THIS MASK OF ALTER EGO TO HIDE OUR VICTIMIZING BEHAVIOR
HE ACTUALLY LIKE THE BEHAVIOR, BOTH NATURALLY OR LEARNED, BUT BECAUSE IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, HE HIDES IT AND THINK THAT HE HATES IT. IT'S HYPOCRITE OR MUNAFIK. PRETEND/FALSE APPEARANCE.
SO, HYPOCRISY IS PRETENDING TO BE A SOCIAL SAVIOUR WHO HATES AND CONDEMN SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE BEHAVIORS TO HIDE HIS OWN BEHAVIORS. AN ADDICT WILL HATE ADDICT, A GOSSIPER WILL HATE GOSSIP, A HYPOCRITE WILL HATE A HYPOCRITE. HE IS TRYING TO REDEEM SELF BY HATING WHAT SOCIETY HATE TO BE ACCEPTED. HOWEVER, SAYING HATING IT AND HATING IT IS TOTALLY DIFFERENT.
INDIVIDUALLY, THE BEHAVIOR IS PLEASURABLE BUT SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE. SO A PERSON PRETEND TO MAINTAIN IMAGE. SO, WHEN A PERSON TALK ABOUT OTHERS' BAD BEHAVIORS, HE IS CONVINCING OTHERS AND SELF THAT HE DIDN'T HAVE THE BEHAVIORS. SO HE HAS TO KEEP REMINDING SELF AND OTHERS TO KEEP SECRET OF THAT BEHAVIOR. HE IS TRYING TO CONVINCE SELF AND OTHERS TO BELIEVE THAT HE DIDN'T DO THAT PARTICULAR BEHAVIOR. THAT'S WHY HE ONLY FOCUS ON BEHAVIORS THAT HE FINDS TROUBLESOME TO COVER UP. HE WILL TALK ABOUT OTHERS' BAD BEHAVIORS AND HOW HE IS THE OPPOSITE OF THAT BEHAVIORS WHERE HE IS ACTUALLY TALKING ABOUT HIS OWN BEHAVIORS. HE IS TRYING TO USE THE OPPORTUNITY TO HIDE HIS BEHAVIOR BY TALKING ABOUT THE BEHAVIOR THAT "HE DID NOT" DO BEFORE PEOPLE FIND OUT ABOUT HIS BEHAVIOR. HE WILL POINT TO OTHERS/BLAME OTHERS OF THE BEHAVIORS SO THE FOCUS IS OFF HIM.
HE IS TRYING TO RECONVINCE PEOPLE AND SELF AGAIN AND AGAIN THAT HE DOES NOT HAVE THAT FLAW BY FOCUSING ON OTHERS AND ACTING THAT HE HATES IT AND THUS COVERING UP HIS OWN. HE THUS CLOSE HIS EYES ON HIS OWN BEHAVIOR AND WAS NOT AWARE
HYPOCRISY IS DENIAL OF SELF. IT'S DEFENSE MECHANISM.
C. G. Jung a few times referred to the hypocrisy of people who are not aware of the dark or shadow-side of their nature.
IN LEARNING, WE ARE NURTURED BY ENVIRONMENT
NATURALLY, WE HAVE GENETIC TEMPERAMENT, ACTIVE/PASSIVE, SOCIALLY EASY/DIFFICULT, SENSITIVE/NOT SENSITIVE
THIS IS OUR BASIC FOUNDATION AND BELOW AWARENESS
SELF IS BELOW AWARENESS FROM THE BEGINNING
ONLY LATER WE DEVELOP COGNITION/MIND AS ADDITION TO OUR SENSES
SOME OF OUR TEMPERAMENT IS ACCEPTABLE BY OUR ENVIRONMENT, SOME IS NOT.
IN ORDER TO FIT IN, WE HAVE TO SUBMERGE OUR TEMPERAMENT
AND LEARN TO ACT THAT INVITE REWARDS AND APPROVAL
WE LEARN TO PRETEND SOCIALLY ACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOR AND HIDE SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOR AND TEMPERAMENT.
IN LEARNING, WE COGNIZE INFORMATION AND AFTER REPEATED ACTION, IT BECOMES AUTOMATIC AND IS SENT TO BELOW AWARENESS
THIS IS ANOTHER PART OF OUR SELVES, SELF THAT WE LEARN
WE LEARN BY WATCHING OTHERS' BEHAVIOR
WE LEARN TO BE VICTIMIZER/VICTIM.
WE PUNISH THOSE WHO VICTIMIZE BUT WE LET OURSELVES VICTIMIZE OTHERS
WE DEVELOP ALTER EGO TO PUNISH THOSE VICTIMIZER BUT OURSELVES
AN ADDICT BECOME COUNSELOR, A SEX OFFENDER BECOME AN ADVOCATE FOR VICTIM.
WE HIDE BEHIND THIS MASK OF ALTER EGO TO HIDE OUR VICTIMIZING BEHAVIOR
HE ACTUALLY LIKE THE BEHAVIOR, BOTH NATURALLY OR LEARNED, BUT BECAUSE IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, HE HIDES IT AND THINK THAT HE HATES IT. IT'S HYPOCRITE OR MUNAFIK. PRETEND/FALSE APPEARANCE.
SO, HYPOCRISY IS PRETENDING TO BE A SOCIAL SAVIOUR WHO HATES AND CONDEMN SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE BEHAVIORS TO HIDE HIS OWN BEHAVIORS. AN ADDICT WILL HATE ADDICT, A GOSSIPER WILL HATE GOSSIP, A HYPOCRITE WILL HATE A HYPOCRITE. HE IS TRYING TO REDEEM SELF BY HATING WHAT SOCIETY HATE TO BE ACCEPTED. HOWEVER, SAYING HATING IT AND HATING IT IS TOTALLY DIFFERENT.
INDIVIDUALLY, THE BEHAVIOR IS PLEASURABLE BUT SOCIALLY UNACCEPTABLE. SO A PERSON PRETEND TO MAINTAIN IMAGE. SO, WHEN A PERSON TALK ABOUT OTHERS' BAD BEHAVIORS, HE IS CONVINCING OTHERS AND SELF THAT HE DIDN'T HAVE THE BEHAVIORS. SO HE HAS TO KEEP REMINDING SELF AND OTHERS TO KEEP SECRET OF THAT BEHAVIOR. HE IS TRYING TO CONVINCE SELF AND OTHERS TO BELIEVE THAT HE DIDN'T DO THAT PARTICULAR BEHAVIOR. THAT'S WHY HE ONLY FOCUS ON BEHAVIORS THAT HE FINDS TROUBLESOME TO COVER UP. HE WILL TALK ABOUT OTHERS' BAD BEHAVIORS AND HOW HE IS THE OPPOSITE OF THAT BEHAVIORS WHERE HE IS ACTUALLY TALKING ABOUT HIS OWN BEHAVIORS. HE IS TRYING TO USE THE OPPORTUNITY TO HIDE HIS BEHAVIOR BY TALKING ABOUT THE BEHAVIOR THAT "HE DID NOT" DO BEFORE PEOPLE FIND OUT ABOUT HIS BEHAVIOR. HE WILL POINT TO OTHERS/BLAME OTHERS OF THE BEHAVIORS SO THE FOCUS IS OFF HIM.
HE IS TRYING TO RECONVINCE PEOPLE AND SELF AGAIN AND AGAIN THAT HE DOES NOT HAVE THAT FLAW BY FOCUSING ON OTHERS AND ACTING THAT HE HATES IT AND THUS COVERING UP HIS OWN. HE THUS CLOSE HIS EYES ON HIS OWN BEHAVIOR AND WAS NOT AWARE
HYPOCRISY IS DENIAL OF SELF. IT'S DEFENSE MECHANISM.
C. G. Jung a few times referred to the hypocrisy of people who are not aware of the dark or shadow-side of their nature.
Every individual needs revolution, inner division, overthrow of the existing order, and renewal, but not by forcing them upon his neighbors under the hypocritical cloak of Christian love or the sense of social responsibility or any of the other beautiful euphemisms for unconscious urges to personal power (Jung, 1966:5).
It is under all circumstances an advantage to be in full possession of one's personality, otherwise the repressed elements will only crop up as a hindrance elsewhere, not just at some unimportant point, but at the very spot where we are most sensitive. If people can be educated to see the shadow-side of their nature clearly, it may be hoped that they will also learn to understand and love their fellow men better. A little less hypocrisy and a little more self-knowledge can only have good results in respect for our neighbor; for we are all too prone to transfer to our fellows the injustice and violence we inflict upon our own natures (Jung, 1966:par. 28).In New Paths in Psychology (1916) Jung pointedly referred to the "hypocritical pretenses of man".
Dream-analysis above all else mercilessly uncovers the lying morality and hypocritical pretences of man, showing him, for once, the other side of his character in the most vivid light (Jung, 1966:par. 437).
HYPOCRISY 2
THERE ARE 2 TYPES OF HYPOCRISIES:
1. SITUATIONAL OR SYMPTOMAL
THIS IS CALLED A LIE
2. PATHOLOGICAL
THIS IS CAUSED BY ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT, DENIAL OF SELF AND ADOPTING SOCIAL DESIRABLE MASK.
WHEN THE HYPOCRISY GOES UP, THE EMPATHY GOES DOWN DUE TO BLOCKAGE TO SELF EMPATHY
1. SITUATIONAL OR SYMPTOMAL
THIS IS CALLED A LIE
2. PATHOLOGICAL
THIS IS CAUSED BY ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT, DENIAL OF SELF AND ADOPTING SOCIAL DESIRABLE MASK.
WHEN THE HYPOCRISY GOES UP, THE EMPATHY GOES DOWN DUE TO BLOCKAGE TO SELF EMPATHY
Sunday, April 8, 2012
extrovert introvert
Everything comes from the mind, everything was created by the mind
like command yelled or advertisement
trying to explain the unexplainable, trying to lead others astray
things from the present or things of the future and far away
there are two worlds, where we give and we were given
the world where we give is dominant and the world we were given is tertiarry
some people are dominant extrovert or dominant introvert
D ET, D EF, D IT, D IF
D ETS, D ETN, D EFS, D EFN, D ITS, D ITN, D IFS, D IFN
D ETSJ, D ETSP, D ETNJ, D ETNP, D EFSJ, D EFSP, D EFNJ, D EFNP, D ITSJ, D ITSP, D ITNJ, D ITNP, D IFSJ, D IFSP, D IFNJ, D IFNP
HOWEVER, EVERYONE HAS A SHADOW, THE OPPOSITE OF THE DOMINANT
D ETSJ - S IFNP
D ETSP - S IFNJ
D ETNJ - S IFSP
D ETNP - S IFSJ
D EFSJ - S ITNP
D EFSP - S ITNJ
D EFNJ - S ITSP
D EFNP - S ITSJ
D ITSJ - S EFNP
D ITSP - S EFNJ
D ITNJ - S EFSP
D ITNP - S EFSJ
D IFSJ - S ETNP
D IFSP - S ETNJ
D IFNJ - S ETSP
D IFNP - S ETSJ
some people feels more comfortable in the active and some in the passive world
the rules in one is reversed in others
personality is the dominant, shadow is the tertiary
for an extrovert, he think/feel, sense/intuit with the present/concrete things but he expect others to be the shadow
for an introvert, he deals with abstract/future things but he expect others to be concrete.
like command yelled or advertisement
trying to explain the unexplainable, trying to lead others astray
things from the present or things of the future and far away
there are two worlds, where we give and we were given
the world where we give is dominant and the world we were given is tertiarry
some people are dominant extrovert or dominant introvert
D ET, D EF, D IT, D IF
D ETS, D ETN, D EFS, D EFN, D ITS, D ITN, D IFS, D IFN
D ETSJ, D ETSP, D ETNJ, D ETNP, D EFSJ, D EFSP, D EFNJ, D EFNP, D ITSJ, D ITSP, D ITNJ, D ITNP, D IFSJ, D IFSP, D IFNJ, D IFNP
HOWEVER, EVERYONE HAS A SHADOW, THE OPPOSITE OF THE DOMINANT
D ETSJ - S IFNP
D ETSP - S IFNJ
D ETNJ - S IFSP
D ETNP - S IFSJ
D EFSJ - S ITNP
D EFSP - S ITNJ
D EFNJ - S ITSP
D EFNP - S ITSJ
D ITSJ - S EFNP
D ITSP - S EFNJ
D ITNJ - S EFSP
D ITNP - S EFSJ
D IFSJ - S ETNP
D IFSP - S ETNJ
D IFNJ - S ETSP
D IFNP - S ETSJ
some people feels more comfortable in the active and some in the passive world
the rules in one is reversed in others
personality is the dominant, shadow is the tertiary
for an extrovert, he think/feel, sense/intuit with the present/concrete things but he expect others to be the shadow
for an introvert, he deals with abstract/future things but he expect others to be concrete.
Saturday, April 7, 2012
Easter2012
dominant introverted with perceptive style, intuitive and use feeling in this world, dynamic, energetic.
secondary judging, sensing, and thinking in dealing with the world.
secondary judging, sensing, and thinking in dealing with the world.
Friday, April 6, 2012
desire
learning is desire like appetite
emptiness is like hunger to know
emptiness is not the problem, false information is
study is like eating
focus on self and dont sacrifice it
it';s not my job to meet others' needs
it's my job to meet my needs as long as it doesn't harm myself and others
others can also harm me, like addiction
it's sickness to meet others' needs to meet my needs or to meet my needs by meeting others' needs
it's sickness to sacrifice my needs to meet others needs
this result in addiction and overindulgance to compensate the suffering
the sickness is believing that I have to meet others needs and others have to meet my needs
the failure to do so will produce endless frustration that needs endless coping
emptiness is like hunger to know
emptiness is not the problem, false information is
study is like eating
focus on self and dont sacrifice it
it';s not my job to meet others' needs
it's my job to meet my needs as long as it doesn't harm myself and others
others can also harm me, like addiction
it's sickness to meet others' needs to meet my needs or to meet my needs by meeting others' needs
it's sickness to sacrifice my needs to meet others needs
this result in addiction and overindulgance to compensate the suffering
the sickness is believing that I have to meet others needs and others have to meet my needs
the failure to do so will produce endless frustration that needs endless coping
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)